<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ben Brownings Blog &#187; VMware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bensbrowning.com/tag/vmware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bensbrowning.com</link>
	<description>Another *nix Geek With A Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:25:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>VMware Beaconing</title>
		<link>http://www.bensbrowning.com/2008/12/14/vmware-beaconing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bensbrowning.com/2008/12/14/vmware-beaconing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 02:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wheel v2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[why]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bensbrowning.com/?p=56</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just read Beaconing Demystified: Using Beaconing to Detect Link Failures, and I have to say I am still confused. Why do this? With 3 or more uplinks in a team, we can pin point failures of a single uplink. With 2 uplinks in a team, we can detect downstream link failure, but we don&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bensbrowning.com/2008/12/14/vmware-beaconing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Benefits of Virtualization</title>
		<link>http://www.bensbrowning.com/2008/12/06/benefits-of-virtualization/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bensbrowning.com/2008/12/06/benefits-of-virtualization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 23:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[esxi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gsx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bensbrowning.com/?p=42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ll admit it. I was skeptical about the virtualization hype. I am not a big fan of adding overhead with no point- X on a server machine for example. The products I had played with were early on- Xen, Qemu, and other ones like that. They, frankly, sucked. About half a year ago, though, I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bensbrowning.com/2008/12/06/benefits-of-virtualization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fragmented efforts</title>
		<link>http://www.bensbrowning.com/2008/11/22/fragmented-efforts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bensbrowning.com/2008/11/22/fragmented-efforts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 19:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bensbrowning.com/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having had a friend at a party last night tell me about some new Linux distro he was playing with, I found myself wondering&#8230; Which inevitably led to wandering. Now I am pondering why, exactly, there need to be 326 linux distros out there. I&#8217;ve used a lot of distros over my time as an [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bensbrowning.com/2008/11/22/fragmented-efforts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

